7 relations: Bright-line rule, Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Michigan Court of Appeals, Michigan Supreme Court, Supreme Court of the United States, Terry v. Ohio, United States v. Brignoni-Ponce.
Bright-line rule
A bright-line rule (or bright-line test) is a clearly defined rule or standard in the United States, composed of objective factors, which leaves little or no room for varying interpretation.
New!!: Michigan v. Summers and Bright-line rule · See more »
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.
New!!: Michigan v. Summers and Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution · See more »
Michigan Court of Appeals
The Michigan Court of Appeals is the intermediate-level appellate court of the state of Michigan.
New!!: Michigan v. Summers and Michigan Court of Appeals · See more »
Michigan Supreme Court
The Michigan Supreme Court is the highest court in the U.S. state of Michigan.
New!!: Michigan v. Summers and Michigan Supreme Court · See more »
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States (sometimes colloquially referred to by the acronym SCOTUS) is the highest federal court of the United States.
New!!: Michigan v. Summers and Supreme Court of the United States · See more »
Terry v. Ohio
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous." For their own protection, after a person has been stopped, police may perform a quick surface search of the person’s outer clothing for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person stopped is armed.
New!!: Michigan v. Summers and Terry v. Ohio · See more »
United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
United States v. Brignoni-Ponce,, was the case in which the Supreme Court determined it was a violation of the Fourth Amendment for a roving patrol car to stop a vehicle solely on the basis of the driver appearing to be of Mexican descent.
New!!: Michigan v. Summers and United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · See more »
Redirects here:
452 U.S. 692, Michigan v Summers.