Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Androidâ„¢ device!
Download
Faster access than browser!
 

R v Pamajewon and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between R v Pamajewon and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982

R v Pamajewon vs. Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982

R v Pamajewon, 2 S.C.R. 821, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on Aboriginal self-government under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 provides constitutional protection to the indigenous and treaty rights of indigenous peoples in Canada.

Similarities between R v Pamajewon and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982

R v Pamajewon and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 have 7 things in common (in Unionpedia): Constitution Act, 1982, Indian Act, Indian Health Transfer Policy, Indigenous self-government in Canada, Numbered Treaties, R v Van der Peet, The Canadian Crown and Indigenous peoples of Canada.

Constitution Act, 1982

The Constitution Act, 1982 (Schedule B of the Parliament of the United Kingdom's Canada Act 1982) is a part of the Constitution of Canada.

Constitution Act, 1982 and R v Pamajewon · Constitution Act, 1982 and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 · See more »

Indian Act

The Indian Act (An Act respecting Indians, Loi sur les Indiens), (the Act) is a Canadian Act of Parliament that concerns registered Indians, their bands, and the system of Indian reserves.

Indian Act and R v Pamajewon · Indian Act and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 · See more »

Indian Health Transfer Policy

The Indian Health Transfer Policy of Canada, provided a framework for the assumption of control of health services by Aboriginal Canadians and set forth a developmental approach to transfer centred on the concept of self-determination in health.

Indian Health Transfer Policy and R v Pamajewon · Indian Health Transfer Policy and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 · See more »

Indigenous self-government in Canada

Indigenous or Aboriginal self-government refers to proposals to give governments representing the Indigenous peoples in Canada greater powers of government.

Indigenous self-government in Canada and R v Pamajewon · Indigenous self-government in Canada and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 · See more »

Numbered Treaties

The Numbered Treaties (or Post-Confederation Treaties) are a series of eleven treaties signed between the Aboriginal peoples in Canada (or First Nations) and the reigning monarch of Canada (Victoria, Edward VII or George V) from 1871 to 1921.

Numbered Treaties and R v Pamajewon · Numbered Treaties and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 · See more »

R v Van der Peet

R v Van der Peet, 2 S.C.R. 507 is a leading case on Aboriginal rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

R v Pamajewon and R v Van der Peet · R v Van der Peet and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 · See more »

The Canadian Crown and Indigenous peoples of Canada

The association between the Canadian Crown and Indigenous peoples of Canada stretches back to the first decisions between North American Indigenous peoples and European colonialists and, over centuries of interface, treaties were established concerning the monarch and Indigenous tribes.

R v Pamajewon and The Canadian Crown and Indigenous peoples of Canada · Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and The Canadian Crown and Indigenous peoples of Canada · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

R v Pamajewon and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 Comparison

R v Pamajewon has 13 relations, while Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 has 32. As they have in common 7, the Jaccard index is 15.56% = 7 / (13 + 32).

References

This article shows the relationship between R v Pamajewon and Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »