Table of Contents
9 relations: Amendments under the European Patent Convention, Appeal procedure before the European Patent Office, European Patent Convention, European Patent Office, Glossary of patent law terms, Patent claim, Person having ordinary skill in the art, Peter Messerli, Priority right.
- 2001 in Europe
- 2001 in case law
- Case law of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office
Amendments under the European Patent Convention
Article 123 of the European Patent Convention (EPC) relates to the amendments under the EPC, i.e. the amendments to a European patent application or patent, and notably the conditions under which they are allowable.
See G 2/98 and Amendments under the European Patent Convention
Appeal procedure before the European Patent Office
The European Patent Convention (EPC), the multilateral treaty instituting the legal system according to which European patents are granted, contains provisions allowing a party to appeal a decision issued by a first instance department of the European Patent Office (EPO).
See G 2/98 and Appeal procedure before the European Patent Office
European Patent Convention
The European Patent Convention (EPC), also known as the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of 5 October 1973, is a multilateral treaty instituting the European Patent Organisation and providing an autonomous legal system according to which European patents are granted.
See G 2/98 and European Patent Convention
European Patent Office
The European Patent Office (EPO) is one of the two organs of the European Patent Organisation (EPOrg), the other being the Administrative Council.
See G 2/98 and European Patent Office
Glossary of patent law terms
This is a list of legal terms relating to patents and patent law.
See G 2/98 and Glossary of patent law terms
Patent claim
In a patent or patent application, the claims define in technical terms the extent, i.e. the scope, of the protection conferred by a patent, or the protection sought in a patent application.
Person having ordinary skill in the art
A person having ordinary skill in the art (abbreviated PHOSITA), a person of (ordinary) skill in the art (POSITA or PSITA), a person skilled in the art, a skilled addressee or simply a skilled person is a legal fiction found in many patent laws throughout the world.
See G 2/98 and Person having ordinary skill in the art
Peter Messerli
Peter Messerli was Vice-President of the European Patent Office (EPO) and head of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO known as DG3 (Directorate-General, 3, Appeals) from 1996 until his retirement at the end of November 2011.
Priority right
In patent law, industrial design law, and trademark law, a priority right or right of priority is a time-limited right, triggered by the first filing of an application for a patent, an industrial design or a trademark respectively.
See also
2001 in Europe
- 14th European Film Awards
- 2001 Kodori crisis
- 2001 in Albania
- 2001 in Armenia
- 2001 in Belgium
- 2001 in Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 2001 in Bulgaria
- 2001 in Croatia
- 2001 in Cyprus
- 2001 in Denmark
- 2001 in England
- 2001 in Estonia
- 2001 in Europe
- 2001 in France
- 2001 in Germany
- 2001 in Greece
- 2001 in Iceland
- 2001 in Ireland
- 2001 in Italy
- 2001 in Luxembourg
- 2001 in Moldova
- 2001 in Monaco
- 2001 in Montenegro
- 2001 in Northern Ireland
- 2001 in Norway
- 2001 in Portugal
- 2001 in Romania
- 2001 in Russia
- 2001 in Scotland
- 2001 in Serbia
- 2001 in Spain
- 2001 in Sweden
- 2001 in Switzerland
- 2001 in Turkey
- 2001 in Ukraine
- 2001 in Wales
- 2001 in the European Union
- 2001 in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
- 2001 in the Netherlands
- 2001 in the Republic of Ireland
- 2001 in the United Kingdom
- Eurovision Song Contest 2001
- G 2/98
2001 in case law
- Adam v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
- Arseculeratne v. Priyani Soysa
- Auckland Harbour Board v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
- Braddish v DPP
- Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd
- CME/Lauder v. Czech Republic
- Commonwealth v Yarmirr
- Cyprus v Turkey
- De Roiste v Minister for Defence
- Director of Immigration v Chong Fung Yuen
- Fateh Muhammad v Commissioner of Registration
- Fletcher Aluminium Ltd v O'Sullivan
- Fletcher Challenge Energy Ltd v Electricity Corp of New Zealand Ltd
- G 2/98
- Garratt v Ikeda
- Geraets-Smits v Stichting Ziekenfonds
- IgnatÄne v. Latvia
- Jerusalem v. Austria
- Kevin Sweeney case
- Konsumentombudsmannen v Gourmet AB
- LaGrand case
- Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria
- Neilson v A-G
- Oxborough v North Harbour Builders Ltd
- Oy Liikenne Ab v Liskojärvi
- P., L., & B. v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform
- Pan Am Flight 103 bombing trial
- Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd (in liq)
- Re Kevin – validity of marriage of transsexual
- Republic of Fiji Islands v Prasad
- Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd
- Ruddock v Vadarlis
- Van Kleef v Colonial Mutual General Insurance Co (NZ) Ltd
- Van Soest v Residual Health Management Unit
Case law of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office
- Art. 23 1/15, Art. 23 2/15 and Art. 23 1/16
- G 1/03 and G 2/03
- G 1/05 and G 1/06
- G 1/07
- G 1/09
- G 1/10
- G 1/11
- G 1/12
- G 1/13
- G 1/15
- G 1/19
- G 1/21
- G 1/83, G 5/83 and G 6/83
- G 1/84
- G 2/06
- G 2/08
- G 2/10
- G 2/12 and G 2/13
- G 2/19
- G 2/93
- G 2/98
- G 3/08
- G 4/95
- G 9/93
- List of decisions and opinions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office
- List of successful petitions for review under Article 112a of the European Patent Convention
- R 19/12