Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Androidâ„¢ device!
Install
Faster access than browser!
 

Hartog v Colin & Shields

Index Hartog v Colin & Shields

Hartog v Colin & Shields 3 All ER 566 is an important English contract law case regarding unilateral mistake. [1]

13 relations: Brussels, Dalgety plc, Defendant, English contract law, Fur clothing, John Singleton (British judge), Mistake (contract law), Plaintiff, Rescission (contract law), Smith v Hughes, Specific performance, Tamplin v James, The Moorcock.

Brussels

Brussels (Bruxelles,; Brussel), officially the Brussels-Capital Region (All text and all but one graphic show the English name as Brussels-Capital Region.) (Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest), is a region of Belgium comprising 19 municipalities, including the City of Brussels, which is the de jure capital of Belgium.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and Brussels · See more »

Dalgety plc

Dalgety plc —as Dalgety and Company— was for more than a century a major pastoral and agricultural company or stock and station agency in Australia and New Zealand.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and Dalgety plc · See more »

Defendant

A defendant is a person accused of committing a crime in criminal prosecution or a person against whom some type of civil relief is being sought in a civil case.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and Defendant · See more »

English contract law

English contract law is a body of law regulating contracts in England and Wales.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and English contract law · See more »

Fur clothing

Fur clothing is clothing made of furry animal hides.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and Fur clothing · See more »

John Singleton (British judge)

Sir John Edward Singleton (18 January 1885 – 6 January 1957) was a British politician and judge.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and John Singleton (British judge) · See more »

Mistake (contract law)

In contract law, a mistake is an erroneous belief, at contracting, that certain facts are true.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and Mistake (contract law) · See more »

Plaintiff

A plaintiff (Π in legal shorthand) is the party who initiates a lawsuit (also known as an action) before a court.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and Plaintiff · See more »

Rescission (contract law)

In contract law, rescission has been defined as the unmaking of a contract between parties.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and Rescission (contract law) · See more »

Smith v Hughes

Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597 is an English contract law case.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and Smith v Hughes · See more »

Specific performance

Specific performance is an equitable remedy in the law of contract, whereby a court issues an order requiring a party to perform a specific act, such to complete performance of the contract.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and Specific performance · See more »

Tamplin v James

Tamplin v James (1880) 15 Ch D 215 is an English contract law case concerning the availability of specific performance for a breach of contract induced by mistake.

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and Tamplin v James · See more »

The Moorcock

The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64 is a leading English contract law case which incepted an important test for identifying the main terms the law will imply into commercial (non-consumer) agreements, that is those "necessary and obvious...to give business efficacy".

New!!: Hartog v Colin & Shields and The Moorcock · See more »

Redirects here:

Hartog v. Colin & Shields, Hartog v. Colin and Shields.

References

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartog_v_Colin_%26_Shields

OutgoingIncoming
Hey! We are on Facebook now! »