Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Androidâ„¢ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

Rooker–Feldman doctrine

Index Rooker–Feldman doctrine

The Rooker–Feldman doctrine is a rule of civil procedure enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in two cases, Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,. [1]

14 relations: Anti-Injunction Act, Civil procedure, District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., Federal judiciary of the United States, Florida, Habeas corpus, Joseph E. Irenas, Palm Sunday Compromise, Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., Supreme Court of the United States, Terri Schiavo case, The Green Bag, 2005 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Anti-Injunction Act

The Anti-Injunction Act (ch. 22 of the Acts of the 2nd United States Congress, 2nd Session), is a United States federal statute that prohibits any federal court from issuing an injunction against proceedings in any state court, except within three specifically defined exceptions.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Anti-Injunction Act · See more »

Civil procedure

Civil procedure is the body of law that sets out the rules and standards that courts follow when adjudicating civil lawsuits (as opposed to procedures in criminal law matters).

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Civil procedure · See more »

District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court enunciated a rule of civil procedure known as the Rooker-Feldman doctrine (also named for the earlier case of Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923). The doctrine holds that lower United States federal courts may not sit in direct review of state court decisions.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · See more »

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.

Exxon Mobil Corp.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · See more »

Federal judiciary of the United States

The federal judiciary of the United States is one of the three co-equal branches of the federal government of the United States organized under the United States Constitution and laws of the federal government.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Federal judiciary of the United States · See more »

Florida

Florida (Spanish for "land of flowers") is the southernmost contiguous state in the United States.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Florida · See more »

Habeas corpus

Habeas corpus (Medieval Latin meaning literally "that you have the body") is a recourse in law through which a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court and request that the court order the custodian of the person, usually a prison official, to bring the prisoner to court, to determine whether the detention is lawful.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Habeas corpus · See more »

Joseph E. Irenas

Joseph Eron Irenas (July 13, 1940 – October 16, 2015) was a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Joseph E. Irenas · See more »

Palm Sunday Compromise

The Palm Sunday Compromise, formally known as the Act for the relief of the parents of Theresa Marie Schiavo, is an Act of Congress passed on March 21, 2005, to allow the case of Terri Schiavo to be moved into a federal court.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Palm Sunday Compromise · See more »

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.,, was a case in which the United States Supreme Court enunciated a rule of civil procedure that would eventually become known as the ''Rooker-Feldman'' doctrine (also named for the later case of District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,. The doctrine holds that lower United States federal courts may not sit in direct review of state court decisions.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · See more »

Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States (sometimes colloquially referred to by the acronym SCOTUS) is the highest federal court of the United States.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Supreme Court of the United States · See more »

Terri Schiavo case

The Terri Schiavo case was a right-to-die legal case in the United States from 1990 to 2005, involving Theresa Marie "Terri" Schiavo (December 3, 1963 – March 31, 2005), a woman in an irreversible persistent vegetative state.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and Terri Schiavo case · See more »

The Green Bag

The Green Bag: An Entertaining Journal of Law (second series) is a quarterly legal journal dedicated to publishing "good writing" about the law.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and The Green Bag · See more »

2005 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2005 term, which lasted from October 3, 2005 until October 1, 2006.

New!!: Rooker–Feldman doctrine and 2005 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States · See more »

Redirects here:

Rooker-Feldman, Rooker-Feldman Doctrine, Rooker-Feldman doctrine.

References

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rooker–Feldman_doctrine

OutgoingIncoming
Hey! We are on Facebook now! »