We are working to restore the Unionpedia app on the Google Play Store
OutgoingIncoming
🌟We've simplified our design for better navigation!
Instagram Facebook X LinkedIn

T 931/95

Index T 931/95

T 931/95, commonly known as Pension Benefit Systems Partnership, is a decision of a Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), issued on September 8, 2000. [1]

Table of Contents

  1. 13 relations: Appeal procedure before the European Patent Office, Business method patent, European Patent Convention, Invention, Inventive step under the European Patent Convention, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, List of decisions of the EPO Boards of Appeal relating to Article 52(2) and (3) EPC, Patent claim, Patent World, Patentability, Software patents under the European Patent Convention, T 258/03, T 641/00.

  2. 2000 in Europe
  3. 2000 in case law
  4. European Patent Office case law
  5. Software patent case law

Appeal procedure before the European Patent Office

The European Patent Convention (EPC), the multilateral treaty instituting the legal system according to which European patents are granted, contains provisions allowing a party to appeal a decision issued by a first instance department of the European Patent Office (EPO).

See T 931/95 and Appeal procedure before the European Patent Office

Business method patent

Business method patents are a class of patents which disclose and claim new methods of doing business.

See T 931/95 and Business method patent

European Patent Convention

The European Patent Convention (EPC), also known as the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of 5 October 1973, is a multilateral treaty instituting the European Patent Organisation and providing an autonomous legal system according to which European patents are granted.

See T 931/95 and European Patent Convention

Invention

An invention is a unique or novel device, method, composition, idea or process.

See T 931/95 and Invention

Inventive step under the European Patent Convention

Under the European Patent Convention (EPC), European patents shall be granted for inventions which inter alia involve an inventive step.

See T 931/95 and Inventive step under the European Patent Convention

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

The Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice is a monthly peer-reviewed law journal covering intellectual property law and practice, published by Oxford University Press.

See T 931/95 and Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

List of decisions of the EPO Boards of Appeal relating to Article 52(2) and (3) EPC

This list provides a guide to decisions of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) relating to. T 931/95 and list of decisions of the EPO Boards of Appeal relating to Article 52(2) and (3) EPC are European Patent Office case law and software patent case law.

See T 931/95 and List of decisions of the EPO Boards of Appeal relating to Article 52(2) and (3) EPC

Patent claim

In a patent or patent application, the claims define in technical terms the extent, i.e. the scope, of the protection conferred by a patent, or the protection sought in a patent application.

See T 931/95 and Patent claim

Patent World

Patent World was a monthly magazine published in English and specialized in patent law and business.

See T 931/95 and Patent World

Patentability

Within the context of a national or multilateral body of law, an invention is patentable if it meets the relevant legal conditions to be granted a patent.

See T 931/95 and Patentability

Software patents under the European Patent Convention

The patentability of software, computer programs and computer-implemented inventions under the European Patent Convention (EPC) is the extent to which subject matter in these fields is patentable under the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of October 5, 1973.

See T 931/95 and Software patents under the European Patent Convention

T 258/03

T 258/03, also known as Auction Method/Hitachi, is a decision of a Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), issued on April 21, 2004. T 931/95 and t 258/03 are European Patent Office case law and software patent case law.

See T 931/95 and T 258/03

T 641/00

T 641/00, also known as Two identities/COMVIK, is a decision of a Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), issued on September 26, 2002. T 931/95 and t 641/00 are European Patent Office case law and software patent case law.

See T 931/95 and T 641/00

See also

2000 in Europe

2000 in case law

European Patent Office case law

Software patent case law

References

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T_931/95

Also known as Controlling pension benefits system/PBS PARTNERSHIP, ECLI:EP:BA:2000:T093195.20000908, Pension Benefit System, Pension Benefit Systems Partnership, Pension Benefits System Partnership, Pension Benefits System Partnership (decision).