Similarities between 65,536 and Word (computer architecture)
65,536 and Word (computer architecture) have 6 things in common (in Unionpedia): Bit, Integer (computer science), Motorola 68000 series, Power of two, Word (computer architecture), X86.
Bit
The bit (a portmanteau of binary digit) is a basic unit of information used in computing and digital communications.
65,536 and Bit · Bit and Word (computer architecture) ·
Integer (computer science)
In computer science, an integer is a datum of integral data type, a data type that represents some range of mathematical integers.
65,536 and Integer (computer science) · Integer (computer science) and Word (computer architecture) ·
Motorola 68000 series
The Motorola 68000 series (also termed 680x0, m68000, m68k, or 68k) is a family of 32-bit CISC microprocessors.
65,536 and Motorola 68000 series · Motorola 68000 series and Word (computer architecture) ·
Power of two
In mathematics, a power of two is a number of the form where is an integer, i.e. the result of exponentiation with number two as the base and integer as the exponent.
65,536 and Power of two · Power of two and Word (computer architecture) ·
Word (computer architecture)
In computing, a word is the natural unit of data used by a particular processor design.
65,536 and Word (computer architecture) · Word (computer architecture) and Word (computer architecture) ·
X86
x86 is a family of backward-compatible instruction set architectures based on the Intel 8086 CPU and its Intel 8088 variant.
The list above answers the following questions
- What 65,536 and Word (computer architecture) have in common
- What are the similarities between 65,536 and Word (computer architecture)
65,536 and Word (computer architecture) Comparison
65,536 has 28 relations, while Word (computer architecture) has 145. As they have in common 6, the Jaccard index is 3.47% = 6 / (28 + 145).
References
This article shows the relationship between 65,536 and Word (computer architecture). To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: