Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

Appeal to emotion and Interventionism (politics)

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Appeal to emotion and Interventionism (politics)

Appeal to emotion vs. Interventionism (politics)

Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones is a logical fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence. Interventionism is a policy of non-defensive (proactive) activity undertaken by a nation-state, or other geo-political jurisdiction of a lesser or greater nature, to manipulate an economy and/or society.

Similarities between Appeal to emotion and Interventionism (politics)

Appeal to emotion and Interventionism (politics) have 2 things in common (in Unionpedia): Appeal to fear, Think of the children.

Appeal to fear

An appeal to fear (also called argumentum ad metum or argumentum in terrorem) is a fallacy in which a person attempts to create support for an idea by attempting to increase fear towards an alternative.

Appeal to emotion and Appeal to fear · Appeal to fear and Interventionism (politics) · See more »

Think of the children

"Think of the children" (also "What about the children?") is a cliché that evolved into a rhetorical tactic.

Appeal to emotion and Think of the children · Interventionism (politics) and Think of the children · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Appeal to emotion and Interventionism (politics) Comparison

Appeal to emotion has 26 relations, while Interventionism (politics) has 264. As they have in common 2, the Jaccard index is 0.69% = 2 / (26 + 264).

References

This article shows the relationship between Appeal to emotion and Interventionism (politics). To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »