Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Androidâ„¢ device!
Install
Faster access than browser!
 

At-large and Idaho Territory's at-large congressional district

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between At-large and Idaho Territory's at-large congressional district

At-large vs. Idaho Territory's at-large congressional district

At-large is a designation for members of a governing body who are elected or appointed to represent the whole membership of the body (for example, a city, state or province, nation, club or association), rather than a subset of that membership. Idaho Territory's At-large congressional district is an obsolete congressional district that encompassed the area of the Idaho Territory, which was originally created from parts of the Washington Territory and Dakota Territory in 1863.

Similarities between At-large and Idaho Territory's at-large congressional district

At-large and Idaho Territory's at-large congressional district have 1 thing in common (in Unionpedia): Idaho's at-large congressional district.

Idaho's at-large congressional district

From its admittance as a state in 1890 to 1913 Idaho was represented in the United States House of Representatives by one at-large representative.

At-large and Idaho's at-large congressional district · Idaho Territory's at-large congressional district and Idaho's at-large congressional district · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

At-large and Idaho Territory's at-large congressional district Comparison

At-large has 185 relations, while Idaho Territory's at-large congressional district has 27. As they have in common 1, the Jaccard index is 0.47% = 1 / (185 + 27).

References

This article shows the relationship between At-large and Idaho Territory's at-large congressional district. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »