Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Install
Faster access than browser!
 

Babylonia and Shamash-mudammiq

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Babylonia and Shamash-mudammiq

Babylonia vs. Shamash-mudammiq

Babylonia was an ancient Akkadian-speaking state and cultural area based in central-southern Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq). Šamaš-mudammiq, inscribed mdŠamaš-mumudammiq (mdUTU-mu-SIG5),Synchronistic King List fragment, KAV 182, Ass 13956dh, iii 9.

Similarities between Babylonia and Shamash-mudammiq

Babylonia and Shamash-mudammiq have 8 things in common (in Unionpedia): Adad-nirari II, Arrapha, Assyria, Babylon, Der (Sumer), Karduniaš, List of kings of Babylon, Nabu-shuma-ukin I.

Adad-nirari II

Adad-nirari II (reigned from 911 to 891 BC) is generally considered to be the first King of Assyria in the Neo-Assyrian period.

Adad-nirari II and Babylonia · Adad-nirari II and Shamash-mudammiq · See more »

Arrapha

Arrapha or Arrapkha (Akkadian: Arrapḫa, Syriac: ܐܪܦܗܐ, أررابخا,عرفة) was an ancient city in what today is northeastern Iraq, on the site of the modern city of Kirkuk.

Arrapha and Babylonia · Arrapha and Shamash-mudammiq · See more »

Assyria

Assyria, also called the Assyrian Empire, was a major Semitic speaking Mesopotamian kingdom and empire of the ancient Near East and the Levant.

Assyria and Babylonia · Assyria and Shamash-mudammiq · See more »

Babylon

Babylon (KA2.DIĜIR.RAKI Bābili(m); Aramaic: בבל, Babel; بَابِل, Bābil; בָּבֶל, Bavel; ܒܒܠ, Bāwēl) was a key kingdom in ancient Mesopotamia from the 18th to 6th centuries BC.

Babylon and Babylonia · Babylon and Shamash-mudammiq · See more »

Der (Sumer)

Der (Sumerian: ALUDi-e-ir, 𒌷𒂦𒀭𒆠 uruBAD3.ANki) was a Sumerian city-state at the site of modern Tell Aqar near al-Badra in Iraq's Wasit Governorate.

Babylonia and Der (Sumer) · Der (Sumer) and Shamash-mudammiq · See more »

Karduniaš

Karduniaš, also transcribed Karduniash, Karaduniyaš or Karaduniše), is a Kassite term used for the kingdom centered on Babylonia and founded by the Kassite dynasty. It is used in the 1350-1335 BC Amarna letters correspondence, and is also used frequently in Middle-Assyrian and Neo-Assyrian texts to refer to the kingdom of Babylon. The name Karaduniyaš is mainly used in the letters written between Kadashman-Enlil I, or Burna-Buriash, the Kings of Babylon, and the Pharaoh of Ancient Egypt-(called: Mizri), letters EA 1-EA 11, a subcorpus of letters, (EA for 'el Amarna'). Much later, a version of the name was used in the Babylonian Talmud as Kardunya referring to similar locations. There are two additional letters in the 382–letter Amarna corpus that reference Karaduniyaš. The first is a damaged, and partial letter, EA 200, (with no author), regarding "Ahlameans", (similar to the Suteans); the title is: "About Ahlameans". The second letter is complete and undamaged, a letter from one of the sons of Labaya, namely Mutbaal-(Mut-Bahli, or Mut-Ba'lu), letter EA 255.

Babylonia and Karduniaš · Karduniaš and Shamash-mudammiq · See more »

List of kings of Babylon

The following is a list of the kings of Babylonia (ancient southern-central Iraq), compiled from the traditional Babylonian king lists and modern archaeological findings.

Babylonia and List of kings of Babylon · List of kings of Babylon and Shamash-mudammiq · See more »

Nabu-shuma-ukin I

Nabû-šuma-ukin I, inscribed mdNābû-šuma-ú-kin,Synchronistic King List iii 16 and variant fragments KAV 10 ii 7, KAV 182 iii 10.

Babylonia and Nabu-shuma-ukin I · Nabu-shuma-ukin I and Shamash-mudammiq · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Babylonia and Shamash-mudammiq Comparison

Babylonia has 455 relations, while Shamash-mudammiq has 14. As they have in common 8, the Jaccard index is 1.71% = 8 / (455 + 14).

References

This article shows the relationship between Babylonia and Shamash-mudammiq. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »