Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

Civil law (common law) and NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007)

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Civil law (common law) and NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007)

Civil law (common law) vs. NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007)

Civil law is a branch of the law. NSA warrantless surveillance (also commonly referred to as "warrantless-wiretapping" or "-wiretaps") refers to the surveillance of persons within the United States, including United States citizens, during the collection of notionally foreign intelligence by the National Security Agency (NSA) as part of the Terrorist Surveillance Program.

Similarities between Civil law (common law) and NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007)

Civil law (common law) and NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007) have 2 things in common (in Unionpedia): Burden of proof (law), Criminal law.

Burden of proof (law)

The burden of proof (onus probandi) is the obligation of a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will prove the claims they have made against the other party.

Burden of proof (law) and Civil law (common law) · Burden of proof (law) and NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007) · See more »

Criminal law

Criminal law is the body of law that relates to crime.

Civil law (common law) and Criminal law · Criminal law and NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007) · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Civil law (common law) and NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007) Comparison

Civil law (common law) has 33 relations, while NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007) has 218. As they have in common 2, the Jaccard index is 0.80% = 2 / (33 + 218).

References

This article shows the relationship between Civil law (common law) and NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007). To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »