Faster access than browser!Similarities between Competition law and United States antitrust law
Competition law and United States antitrust law have 36 things in common (in Unionpedia): Australia, Barriers to entry, Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS, Inc., Cartel, Chicago school of economics, Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, Competition (economics), Continental Television, Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc., European Union, European Union competition law, Herfindahl index, John Sherman, Joint venture, Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., Mergers and acquisitions, Milton Friedman, Monopoly, Oligopoly, Phillip E. Areeda, Predatory pricing, Price discrimination, Price fixing, Price gouging, Public service, Restraint of trade, Richard Posner, Robert Bork, Rule of reason, Sherman Antitrust Act, Small but significant and non-transitory increase in price, ..., Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan, Standard Oil, State Oil Co. v. Khan, The Antitrust Paradox, Tying (commerce), Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP. Expand index (6 more) »
Australia
Australia, officially the Commonwealth of Australia, is a sovereign country comprising the mainland of the Australian continent, the island of Tasmania and numerous smaller islands.
Australia and Competition law · Australia and United States antitrust law ·
Barriers to entry
In theories of competition in economics, a barrier to entry, or an economic barrier to entry, is a cost that must be incurred by a new entrant into a market that incumbents do not have or have not had to incur.
Barriers to entry and Competition law · Barriers to entry and United States antitrust law ·
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS, Inc.
Broadcast Music v. Columbia Broadcasting System,, was an important antitrust case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS, Inc. and Competition law · Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS, Inc. and United States antitrust law ·
Cartel
A cartel is a group of apparently independent producers whose goal is to increase their collective profits by means of price fixing, limiting supply, or other restrictive practices.
Cartel and Competition law · Cartel and United States antitrust law ·
Chicago school of economics
The Chicago school of economics is a neoclassical school of economic thought associated with the work of the faculty at the University of Chicago, some of whom have constructed and popularized its principles.
Chicago school of economics and Competition law · Chicago school of economics and United States antitrust law ·
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 (codified at), was a part of United States antitrust law with the goal of adding further substance to the U.S. antitrust law regime; the Clayton Act sought to prevent anticompetitive practices in their incipiency.
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 and Competition law · Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 and United States antitrust law ·
Competition (economics)
In economics, competition is a condition where different economic firmsThis article follows the general economic convention of referring to all actors as firms; examples in include individuals and brands or divisions within the same (legal) firm.
Competition (economics) and Competition law · Competition (economics) and United States antitrust law ·
Continental Television, Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.
Continental Television v. GTE Sylvania,, was an antitrust decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Competition law and Continental Television, Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Continental Television, Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. and United States antitrust law ·
European Union
The European Union (EU) is a political and economic union of EUnum member states that are located primarily in Europe.
Competition law and European Union · European Union and United States antitrust law ·
European Union competition law
European competition law is the competition law in use within the European Union.
Competition law and European Union competition law · European Union competition law and United States antitrust law ·
Herfindahl index
The Herfindahl index (also known as Herfindahl–Hirschman Index, HHI, or sometimes HHI-score) is a measure of the size of firms in relation to the industry and an indicator of the amount of competition among them.
Competition law and Herfindahl index · Herfindahl index and United States antitrust law ·
John Sherman
John Sherman (May 10, 1823October 22, 1900) was a politician from the U.S. state of Ohio during the American Civil War and into the late nineteenth century.
Competition law and John Sherman · John Sherman and United States antitrust law ·
Joint venture
A joint venture (JV) is a business entity created by two or more parties, generally characterized by shared ownership, shared returns and risks, and shared governance.
Competition law and Joint venture · Joint venture and United States antitrust law ·
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.
Competition law and Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. · Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. and United States antitrust law ·
Mergers and acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are transactions in which the ownership of companies, other business organizations, or their operating units are transferred or consolidated with other entities.
Competition law and Mergers and acquisitions · Mergers and acquisitions and United States antitrust law ·
Milton Friedman
Milton Friedman (July 31, 1912 – November 16, 2006) was an American economist who received the 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his research on consumption analysis, monetary history and theory, and the complexity of stabilization policy.
Competition law and Milton Friedman · Milton Friedman and United States antitrust law ·
Monopoly
A monopoly (from Greek μόνος mónos and πωλεῖν pōleîn) exists when a specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of a particular commodity.
Competition law and Monopoly · Monopoly and United States antitrust law ·
Oligopoly
An oligopoly (from Ancient Greek ὀλίγος (olígos) "few" + πωλεῖν (polein) "to sell") is a market form wherein a market or industry is dominated by a small number of large sellers (oligopolists).
Competition law and Oligopoly · Oligopoly and United States antitrust law ·
Phillip E. Areeda
Phillip Elias Areeda (January 28, 1930 – December 24, 1995) was an American lawyer and legal scholar.
Competition law and Phillip E. Areeda · Phillip E. Areeda and United States antitrust law ·
Predatory pricing
Predatory pricing, also known as undercutting, is a pricing strategy in which a product or service is set at a very low price with the intention to drive competitors out of the market or to create barriers to entry for potential new competitors.
Competition law and Predatory pricing · Predatory pricing and United States antitrust law ·
Price discrimination
Price discrimination is a microeconomic pricing strategy where identical or largely similar goods or services are transacted at different prices by the same provider in different markets.
Competition law and Price discrimination · Price discrimination and United States antitrust law ·
Price fixing
Price fixing is an agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price is maintained at a given level by controlling supply and demand.
Competition law and Price fixing · Price fixing and United States antitrust law ·
Price gouging
Price gouging is a pejorative term referring to when a seller spikes the prices of goods, services or commodities to a level much higher than is considered reasonable or fair, and is considered exploitative, potentially to an unethical extent.
Competition law and Price gouging · Price gouging and United States antitrust law ·
Public service
Public service is a service which is provided by government to people living within its jurisdiction, either directly (through the public sector) or by financing provision of services.
Competition law and Public service · Public service and United States antitrust law ·
Restraint of trade
Restraint of trade is a common law doctrine relating to the enforceability of contractual restrictions on freedom to conduct business.
Competition law and Restraint of trade · Restraint of trade and United States antitrust law ·
Richard Posner
Richard Allen Posner (born January 11, 1939) is an American jurist and economist who was a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago from 1981 until 2017, and is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School.
Competition law and Richard Posner · Richard Posner and United States antitrust law ·
Robert Bork
Robert Heron Bork (March 1, 1927 – December 19, 2012) was an American judge, government official, and legal scholar who advocated the judicial philosophy of originalism.
Competition law and Robert Bork · Robert Bork and United States antitrust law ·
Rule of reason
The rule of reason is a legal doctrine used to interpret the Sherman Antitrust Act, one of the cornerstones of United States antitrust law.
Competition law and Rule of reason · Rule of reason and United States antitrust law ·
Sherman Antitrust Act
The Sherman Antitrust Act (Sherman Act) is a landmark federal statute in the history of United States antitrust law (or "competition law") passed by Congress in 1890 under the presidency of Benjamin Harrison.
Competition law and Sherman Antitrust Act · Sherman Antitrust Act and United States antitrust law ·
Small but significant and non-transitory increase in price
In competition law, before deciding whether companies have significant market power which would justify government intervention, the test of small but significant and non-transitory increase in price (SSNIP) is used to define the relevant market in a consistent way.
Competition law and Small but significant and non-transitory increase in price · Small but significant and non-transitory increase in price and United States antitrust law ·
Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan
Spectrum Sports, Inc.
Competition law and Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan · Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan and United States antitrust law ·
Standard Oil
Standard Oil Co.
Competition law and Standard Oil · Standard Oil and United States antitrust law ·
State Oil Co. v. Khan
State Oil Co.
Competition law and State Oil Co. v. Khan · State Oil Co. v. Khan and United States antitrust law ·
The Antitrust Paradox
The Antitrust Paradox is a 1978 book by Robert Bork that criticized the state of United States antitrust law in the 1970s.
Competition law and The Antitrust Paradox · The Antitrust Paradox and United States antitrust law ·
Tying (commerce)
Tying (informally, product tying) is the practice of selling one product or service as a mandatory addition to the purchase of a different product or service.
Competition law and Tying (commerce) · Tying (commerce) and United States antitrust law ·
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP
Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, often shortened to Verizon v. Trinko,, is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in the field of Antitrust law.
Competition law and Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP · United States antitrust law and Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP ·
The list above answers the following questions
- What Competition law and United States antitrust law have in common
- What are the similarities between Competition law and United States antitrust law
Competition law and United States antitrust law Comparison
Competition law has 207 relations, while United States antitrust law has 272. As they have in common 36, the Jaccard index is 7.52% = 36 / (207 + 272).
References
This article shows the relationship between Competition law and United States antitrust law. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:
