Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Androidâ„¢ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

Critical thinking and National Admissions Test for Law

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Critical thinking and National Admissions Test for Law

Critical thinking vs. National Admissions Test for Law

Critical thinking is the objective analysis of facts to form a judgment. The National Admissions Test for Law, or LNAT, is an admissions aptitude test that was adopted in 2004 by eight UK university law programmes as an admissions requirement for home applicants.

Similarities between Critical thinking and National Admissions Test for Law

Critical thinking and National Admissions Test for Law have 1 thing in common (in Unionpedia): GCE Advanced Level (United Kingdom).

GCE Advanced Level (United Kingdom)

The General Certificate of Education (GCE) Advanced Level, or A Level, is a main school leaving qualification in England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man.

Critical thinking and GCE Advanced Level (United Kingdom) · GCE Advanced Level (United Kingdom) and National Admissions Test for Law · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Critical thinking and National Admissions Test for Law Comparison

Critical thinking has 102 relations, while National Admissions Test for Law has 22. As they have in common 1, the Jaccard index is 0.81% = 1 / (102 + 22).

References

This article shows the relationship between Critical thinking and National Admissions Test for Law. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »