Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Androidâ„¢ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

European Union law and Marshall v Southampton Health Authority

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between European Union law and Marshall v Southampton Health Authority

European Union law vs. Marshall v Southampton Health Authority

European Union law is the system of laws operating within the member states of the European Union. Marshall v Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority (1986) is an EU law case, concerning the conflict of law between a national legal system and European Union law.

Similarities between European Union law and Marshall v Southampton Health Authority

European Union law and Marshall v Southampton Health Authority have 5 things in common (in Unionpedia): Direct effect of European Union law, European Court of Justice, Gordon Slynn, Baron Slynn of Hadley, Preliminary ruling, Standing (law).

Direct effect of European Union law

In European Union law, direct effect is the principle that Union law may, if appropriately framed, confer rights on individuals which the courts of member states of the European Union are bound to recognise and enforce.

Direct effect of European Union law and European Union law · Direct effect of European Union law and Marshall v Southampton Health Authority · See more »

European Court of Justice

The European Court of Justice (ECJ), officially just the Court of Justice (Cour de Justice), is the supreme court of the European Union in matters of European Union law.

European Court of Justice and European Union law · European Court of Justice and Marshall v Southampton Health Authority · See more »

Gordon Slynn, Baron Slynn of Hadley

Gordon Slynn, Baron Slynn of Hadley (17 February 1930 – 7 April 2009) was a British jurist specialising in European and International Law, and a former judge of the European Court of Justice and Lord of Appeal in Ordinary.

European Union law and Gordon Slynn, Baron Slynn of Hadley · Gordon Slynn, Baron Slynn of Hadley and Marshall v Southampton Health Authority · See more »

Preliminary ruling

A preliminary ruling is a decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the interpretation of European Union law, made at the request of a court or tribunal of a European Union member state.

European Union law and Preliminary ruling · Marshall v Southampton Health Authority and Preliminary ruling · See more »

Standing (law)

In law, standing or locus standi is the term for the ability of a party to demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case.

European Union law and Standing (law) · Marshall v Southampton Health Authority and Standing (law) · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

European Union law and Marshall v Southampton Health Authority Comparison

European Union law has 718 relations, while Marshall v Southampton Health Authority has 10. As they have in common 5, the Jaccard index is 0.69% = 5 / (718 + 10).

References

This article shows the relationship between European Union law and Marshall v Southampton Health Authority. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »