Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Download
Faster access than browser!
 

Female genital mutilation and Systematic review

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Female genital mutilation and Systematic review

Female genital mutilation vs. Systematic review

Female genital mutilation (FGM), also known as female genital cutting and female circumcision, is the ritual cutting or removal of some or all of the external female genitalia. Systematic reviews are a type of literature review that uses systematic methods to collect secondary data, critically appraise research studies, and synthesize studies.

Similarities between Female genital mutilation and Systematic review

Female genital mutilation and Systematic review have 1 thing in common (in Unionpedia): Meta-analysis.

Meta-analysis

A meta-analysis is a statistical analysis that combines the results of multiple scientific studies.

Female genital mutilation and Meta-analysis · Meta-analysis and Systematic review · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Female genital mutilation and Systematic review Comparison

Female genital mutilation has 264 relations, while Systematic review has 41. As they have in common 1, the Jaccard index is 0.33% = 1 / (264 + 41).

References

This article shows the relationship between Female genital mutilation and Systematic review. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »