For but not with and Perth-class destroyer
Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.
Difference between For but not with and Perth-class destroyer
For but not with vs. Perth-class destroyer
In naval hardware, fit to receive or fitting "for but not with" is where a weapon or system called for in a design is not installed or is only partially installed during construction, and the installation completed later as needed. The Perth-class destroyers were three modified ''Charles F. Adams''-class guided missile destroyers operated by the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Ordered from Defoe Shipbuilding Company during 1962 and 1963, HMA Ships,, and were the first guided missiled-armed warships, and the first naval ships of United States design, to enter service with the RAN. All three ships operated during the Vietnam War, while Brisbane also participated in the Gulf War. The class was decommissioned between 1999 and 2001, with all three vessels later sunk as dive wrecks.
Similarities between For but not with and Perth-class destroyer
For but not with and Perth-class destroyer have 0 things in common (in Unionpedia).
The list above answers the following questions
- What For but not with and Perth-class destroyer have in common
- What are the similarities between For but not with and Perth-class destroyer
For but not with and Perth-class destroyer Comparison
For but not with has 1 relation, while Perth-class destroyer has 43. As they have in common 0, the Jaccard index is 0.00% = 0 / (1 + 43).
References
This article shows the relationship between For but not with and Perth-class destroyer. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: