Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

ISO/IEC 6937 and Underscore

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between ISO/IEC 6937 and Underscore

ISO/IEC 6937 vs. Underscore

ISO/IEC 6937:2001, Information technology — Coded graphic character set for text communication — Latin alphabet, is a multibyte extension of ASCII, or rather of ISO/IEC 646-IRV. The symbol underscore (_), also called underline, low line or low dash, is a character that originally appeared on the typewriter and was primarily used to underline words.

Similarities between ISO/IEC 6937 and Underscore

ISO/IEC 6937 and Underscore have 4 things in common (in Unionpedia): ASCII, Dash, Diacritic, Whitespace character.

ASCII

ASCII, abbreviated from American Standard Code for Information Interchange, is a character encoding standard for electronic communication.

ASCII and ISO/IEC 6937 · ASCII and Underscore · See more »

Dash

The dash is a punctuation mark that is similar in appearance to and, but differs from these symbols in both length and height.

Dash and ISO/IEC 6937 · Dash and Underscore · See more »

Diacritic

A diacritic – also diacritical mark, diacritical point, diacritical sign, or an accent – is a glyph added to a letter, or basic glyph.

Diacritic and ISO/IEC 6937 · Diacritic and Underscore · See more »

Whitespace character

In computer programming, white space is any character or series of characters that represent horizontal or vertical space in typography.

ISO/IEC 6937 and Whitespace character · Underscore and Whitespace character · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

ISO/IEC 6937 and Underscore Comparison

ISO/IEC 6937 has 129 relations, while Underscore has 59. As they have in common 4, the Jaccard index is 2.13% = 4 / (129 + 59).

References

This article shows the relationship between ISO/IEC 6937 and Underscore. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »