Karenic languages and Tone (linguistics)

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Karenic languages and Tone (linguistics)

Karenic languages vs. Tone (linguistics)

The Karen or Karenic languages are tonal languages spoken by some seven million Karen people. Tone is the use of pitch in language to distinguish lexical or grammatical meaning – that is, to distinguish or to inflect words.

Similarities between Karenic languages and Tone (linguistics)

Karenic languages and Tone (linguistics) have 5 things in common (in Unionpedia): James Matisoff, Mon language, Sino-Tibetan languages, Tone (linguistics), Varieties of Chinese.

James Matisoff

James A. Matisoff (Chinese name: 马蒂索夫 Mǎdìsuǒfū or 马提索夫 Mǎtísuǒfū; born July 14, 1937) is a professor emeritus of Linguistics at the University of California, Berkeley and noted authority on Tibeto-Burman languages and other languages of mainland Southeast Asia.

James Matisoff and Karenic languages · James Matisoff and Tone (linguistics) · See more »

Mon language

The Mon language (ဘာသာ မန်; မွန်ဘာသာ) is an Austroasiatic language spoken by the Mon people, who live in Myanmar and Thailand.

Karenic languages and Mon language · Mon language and Tone (linguistics) · See more »

Sino-Tibetan languages

The Sino-Tibetan languages, in a few sources also known as Trans-Himalayan, are a family of more than 400 languages spoken in East Asia, Southeast Asia and South Asia.

Karenic languages and Sino-Tibetan languages · Sino-Tibetan languages and Tone (linguistics) · See more »

Tone (linguistics)

Tone is the use of pitch in language to distinguish lexical or grammatical meaning – that is, to distinguish or to inflect words.

Karenic languages and Tone (linguistics) · Tone (linguistics) and Tone (linguistics) · See more »

Varieties of Chinese

Chinese, also known as Sinitic, is a branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family consisting of hundreds of local language varieties, many of which are not mutually intelligible.

Karenic languages and Varieties of Chinese · Tone (linguistics) and Varieties of Chinese · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

What Karenic languages and Tone (linguistics) have in common
What are the similarities between Karenic languages and Tone (linguistics)

Karenic languages and Tone (linguistics) Comparison

Karenic languages has 38 relations, while Tone (linguistics) has 230. As they have in common 5, the Jaccard index is 1.87% = 5 / (38 + 230).

References

This article shows the relationship between Karenic languages and Tone (linguistics). To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Unionpedia is a concept map or semantic network organized like an encyclopedia – dictionary. It gives a brief definition of each concept and its relationships.

This is a giant online mental map that serves as a basis for concept diagrams. It's free to use and each article or document can be downloaded. It's a tool, resource or reference for study, research, education, learning or teaching, that can be used by teachers, educators, pupils or students; for the academic world: for school, primary, secondary, high school, middle, technical degree, college, university, undergraduate, master's or doctoral degrees; for papers, reports, projects, ideas, documentation, surveys, summaries, or thesis. Here is the definition, explanation, description, or the meaning of each significant on which you need information, and a list of their associated concepts as a glossary. Available in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Japanese, Chinese, French, German, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Russian, Arabic, Hindi, Swedish, Ukrainian, Hungarian, Catalan, Czech, Hebrew, Danish, Finnish, Indonesian, Norwegian, Romanian, Turkish, Vietnamese, Korean, Thai, Greek, Bulgarian, Croatian, Slovak, Lithuanian, Filipino, Latvian, Estonian and Slovenian. More languages soon.

All the information was extracted from Wikipedia, and it's available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.

Unionpedia is not endorsed by or affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation.

Google Play, Android and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.