Faster access than browser!Similarities between Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and Pakistan Navy
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and Pakistan Navy have 14 things in common (in Unionpedia): Bangladesh Liberation War, Breguet Atlantic, Dassault Mirage 5, FN-6, India, Indian Air Force, Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, Kargil War, Man-portable air-defense system, NATO reporting name, Pakistan Air Force, Soviet Union, United States Marine Corps, United States Navy.
Bangladesh Liberation War
The Bangladesh Liberation War (মুক্তিযুদ্ধ), also known as the Bangladesh War of Independence, or simply the Liberation War in Bangladesh, was a revolution and armed conflict sparked by the rise of the Bengali nationalist and self-determination movement in what was then East Pakistan during the 1971 Bangladesh genocide.
Bangladesh Liberation War and Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 · Bangladesh Liberation War and Pakistan Navy ·
Breguet Atlantic
The Breguet Br.1150 Atlantic is a long-range maritime patrol aircraft designed and manufactured by Breguet Aviation.
Breguet Atlantic and Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 · Breguet Atlantic and Pakistan Navy ·
Dassault Mirage 5
The Dassault Mirage 5 is a supersonic attack aircraft designed in France by Dassault Aviation during the 1960s and manufactured in France and a number of other countries.
Dassault Mirage 5 and Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 · Dassault Mirage 5 and Pakistan Navy ·
FN-6
FN-6 or Feinu-6 is a third generation passive infrared homing (IR) man portable air defence system (MANPADS).
FN-6 and Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 · FN-6 and Pakistan Navy ·
India
India (IAST), also called the Republic of India (IAST), is a country in South Asia.
India and Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 · India and Pakistan Navy ·
Indian Air Force
The Indian Air Force (IAF; IAST: Bhāratīya Vāyu Senā) is the air arm of the Indian armed forces.
Indian Air Force and Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 · Indian Air Force and Pakistan Navy ·
Indo-Pakistani War of 1965
The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 was a culmination of skirmishes that took place between April 1965 and September 1965 between Pakistan and India. The conflict began following Pakistan's Operation Gibraltar, which was designed to infiltrate forces into Jammu and Kashmir to precipitate an insurgency against Indian rule. India retaliated by launching a full-scale military attack on West Pakistan. The seventeen-day war caused thousands of casualties on both sides and witnessed the largest engagement of armored vehicles and the largest tank battle since World War II. Hostilities between the two countries ended after a United Nations-mandated ceasefire was declared following diplomatic intervention by the Soviet Union and the United States, and the subsequent issuance of the Tashkent Declaration. Much of the war was fought by the countries' land forces in Kashmir and along the border between India and Pakistan. This war saw the largest amassing of troops in Kashmir since the Partition of British India in 1947, a number that was overshadowed only during the 2001–2002 military standoff between India and Pakistan. Most of the battles were fought by opposing infantry and armoured units, with substantial backing from air forces, and naval operations. Many details of this war, like those of other Indo-Pakistani Wars, remain unclear. India had the upper hand over Pakistan when the ceasefire was declared. "Satisfied that it had secured a strategic and psychological victory over Pakistan by frustrating its attempt to seize Kashmir by force, when the UN resolution was passed, India accepted its terms... with Pakistan's stocks of ammunition and other essential supplies all but exhausted, and with the military balance tipping steadily in India's favour." "Losses were relatively heavy—on the Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops. Pakistan's army had been able to withstand Indian pressure, but a continuation of the fighting would only have led to further losses and ultimate defeat for Pakistan." Quote: The invading Indian forces outfought their Pakistani counterparts and halted their attack on the outskirts of Lahore, Pakistan's second-largest city. By the time the United Nations intervened on 22 September, Pakistan had suffered a clear defeat. Although the two countries fought to a standoff, the conflict is seen as a strategic and political defeat for Pakistan, "... the war itself was a disaster for Pakistan, from the first failed attempts by Pakistani troops to precipitate an insurgency in Kashmir to the appearance of Indian artillery within range of Lahore International Airport." – U.S. Department of State, – Interview with Steve Coll in United States House of Representatives 12 September 1994South Asia in World Politics By Devin T. Hagerty, 2005 Rowman & Littlefield,, p. 26 as it had neither succeeded in fomenting insurrection in Kashmir "... after some initial success, the momentum behind Pakistan's thrust into Kashmir slowed, and the state's inhabitants rejected exhortations from the Pakistani insurgents to join them in taking up arms against their Indian "oppressors." Pakistan's inability to muster support from the local Kashmiri population proved a disaster, both militarily and politically." nor had it been able to gain meaningful support at an international level. "Mao had decided that China would intervene under two conditions—that India attacked East Pakistan, and that Pakistan requested Chinese intervention. In the end, neither of them obtained." Internationally, the war was viewed in the context of the greater Cold War, and resulted in a significant geopolitical shift in the subcontinent. Before the war, the United States and the United Kingdom had been major material allies of both India and Pakistan, as their primary suppliers of military hardware and foreign developmental aid. During and after the conflict, both India and Pakistan felt betrayed by the perceived lack of support by the western powers for their respective positions; those feelings of betrayal were increased with the imposition of an American and British embargo on military aid to the opposing sides. As a consequence, India and Pakistan openly developed closer relationships with the Soviet Union and China, respectively. The perceived negative stance of the western powers during the conflict, and during the 1971 war, has continued to affect relations between the West and the subcontinent. In spite of improved relations with the U.S. and Britain since the end of the Cold War, the conflict generated a deep distrust of both countries within the subcontinent which to an extent lingers to this day."In retrospect, it is clear that the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 represented a watershed in the West's association with the subcontinent.""By extending the Cold War into South Asia, however, the United States did succeed in disturbing the subcontinent's established politico-military equilibrium, undermining British influence in the region, embittering relations between India and Pakistan and, ironically, facilitating the expansion of communist influence in the developing world." "The legacy of the Johnson arms cut-off remains alive today. Indians simply do not believe that America will be there when India needs military help... the legacy of the U.S. "betrayal" still haunts U.S.-Pakistan relations today.".
Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 and Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 · Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 and Pakistan Navy ·
Kargil War
The Kargil War (करगिल युद्ध, kargil yuddh, کرگل جنگ kargil jang), also known as the Kargil conflict, was an armed conflict between India and Pakistan that took place between May and July 1999 in the Kargil district of Kashmir and elsewhere along the Line of Control (LOC).
Kargil War and Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 · Kargil War and Pakistan Navy ·
Man-portable air-defense system
Man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS or MPADS) are shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles (SLSAMs).
Man-portable air-defense system and Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 · Man-portable air-defense system and Pakistan Navy ·
NATO reporting name
NATO reporting names are code names for military equipment of Russia, China, and, historically, the former Eastern Bloc (Soviet Union and other nations of the Warsaw Pact).
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and NATO reporting name · NATO reporting name and Pakistan Navy ·
Pakistan Air Force
The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) (پاک فِضائیہ—, or alternatively پاکیستان هاوایی فوج, reporting name: PAF) is the aerial warfare branch of the Pakistan Armed Forces, tasked primarily with the aerial defence of Pakistan, with a secondary role of providing air support to the Pakistan Army and the Pakistan Navy.
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and Pakistan Air Force · Pakistan Air Force and Pakistan Navy ·
Soviet Union
The Soviet Union, officially the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was a socialist state in Eurasia that existed from 1922 to 1991.
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and Soviet Union · Pakistan Navy and Soviet Union ·
United States Marine Corps
The United States Marine Corps (USMC), also referred to as the United States Marines, is a branch of the United States Armed Forces responsible for conducting amphibious operations with the United States Navy.
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and United States Marine Corps · Pakistan Navy and United States Marine Corps ·
United States Navy
The United States Navy (USN) is the naval warfare service branch of the United States Armed Forces and one of the seven uniformed services of the United States.
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and United States Navy · Pakistan Navy and United States Navy ·
The list above answers the following questions
- What Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and Pakistan Navy have in common
- What are the similarities between Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and Pakistan Navy
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and Pakistan Navy Comparison
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 has 332 relations, while Pakistan Navy has 386. As they have in common 14, the Jaccard index is 1.95% = 14 / (332 + 386).
References
This article shows the relationship between Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 and Pakistan Navy. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:
