Similarities between Modification of Final Judgment and United States antitrust law
Modification of Final Judgment and United States antitrust law have 5 things in common (in Unionpedia): AT&T Corporation, Breakup of the Bell System, Consent decree, United States Department of Justice, United States v. AT&T.
AT&T Corporation
AT&T Corp., originally the American Telephone and Telegraph Company, is the subsidiary of AT&T that provides voice, video, data, and Internet telecommunications and professional services to businesses, consumers, and government agencies.
AT&T Corporation and Modification of Final Judgment · AT&T Corporation and United States antitrust law ·
Breakup of the Bell System
The breakup of the Bell System was mandated on January 8, 1982, by an agreed consent decree providing that AT&T Corporation would, as had been initially proposed by AT&T, relinquish control of the Bell Operating Companies that had provided local telephone service in the United States and Canada up until that point.
Breakup of the Bell System and Modification of Final Judgment · Breakup of the Bell System and United States antitrust law ·
Consent decree
A consent decree is an agreement or settlement that resolves a dispute between two parties without admission of guilt (in a criminal case) or liability (in a civil case), and most often refers to such a type of settlement in the United States.
Consent decree and Modification of Final Judgment · Consent decree and United States antitrust law ·
United States Department of Justice
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ), also known as the Justice Department, is a federal executive department of the U.S. government, responsible for the enforcement of the law and administration of justice in the United States, equivalent to the justice or interior ministries of other countries. The department was formed in 1870 during the Ulysses S. Grant administration. The Department of Justice administers several federal law enforcement agencies including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). The department is responsible for investigating instances of financial fraud, representing the United States government in legal matters (such as in cases before the Supreme Court), and running the federal prison system. The department is also responsible for reviewing the conduct of local law enforcement as directed by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. The department is headed by the United States Attorney General, who is nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate and is a member of the Cabinet. The current Attorney General is Jeff Sessions.
Modification of Final Judgment and United States Department of Justice · United States Department of Justice and United States antitrust law ·
United States v. AT&T
United States v. AT&T was the antitrust case in the United States that led to the 1984 Bell System divestiture, the breakup of the old American Telephone & Telegraph into the new, seven regional Bell operating companies (RBOC)s and the much smaller new AT&T.
Modification of Final Judgment and United States v. AT&T · United States antitrust law and United States v. AT&T ·
The list above answers the following questions
- What Modification of Final Judgment and United States antitrust law have in common
- What are the similarities between Modification of Final Judgment and United States antitrust law
Modification of Final Judgment and United States antitrust law Comparison
Modification of Final Judgment has 12 relations, while United States antitrust law has 272. As they have in common 5, the Jaccard index is 1.76% = 5 / (12 + 272).
References
This article shows the relationship between Modification of Final Judgment and United States antitrust law. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: