Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Androidâ„¢ device!
Faster access than browser!

Mootness and R (Canada) v Adams

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Mootness and R (Canada) v Adams

Mootness vs. R (Canada) v Adams

In law, the terms moot and mootness have different meanings in British English and American English. Justice Sopinka wrote for a unanimous court in this appeal from the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench on a case in which a Criminal Code section 486 publication ban was overturned by the trial judge, Justice Feehan, after he had found the primary witnesses for both sides of a sexual assault trial to be unreliable.

Similarities between Mootness and R (Canada) v Adams

Mootness and R (Canada) v Adams have 0 things in common (in Unionpedia).

The list above answers the following questions

Mootness and R (Canada) v Adams Comparison

Mootness has 42 relations, while R (Canada) v Adams has 7. As they have in common 0, the Jaccard index is 0.00% = 0 / (42 + 7).


This article shows the relationship between Mootness and R (Canada) v Adams. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »