Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Androidâ„¢ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley and Parker v South Eastern Rly Co

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley and Parker v South Eastern Rly Co

Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley vs. Parker v South Eastern Rly Co

Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley, (29 November 1828 – 9 December 1921) was an English judge. Parker v South Eastern Railway 2 CPD 416 is a famous English contract law case on exclusion clauses where the court held that an individual cannot escape a contractual term by failing to read the contract but that a party wanting to rely on an exclusion clause must take reasonable steps to bring it to the attention of the customer.

Similarities between Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley and Parker v South Eastern Rly Co

Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley and Parker v South Eastern Rly Co have 1 thing in common (in Unionpedia): Court of Appeal (England and Wales).

Court of Appeal (England and Wales)

The Court of Appeal (COA, formally "Her Majesty's Court of Appeal in England") is the highest court within the Senior Courts of England and Wales, and second only to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.

Court of Appeal (England and Wales) and Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley · Court of Appeal (England and Wales) and Parker v South Eastern Rly Co · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley and Parker v South Eastern Rly Co Comparison

Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley has 56 relations, while Parker v South Eastern Rly Co has 15. As they have in common 1, the Jaccard index is 1.41% = 1 / (56 + 15).

References

This article shows the relationship between Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley and Parker v South Eastern Rly Co. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »