Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Install
Faster access than browser!
 

Naturalistic fallacy and Value theory

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Naturalistic fallacy and Value theory

Naturalistic fallacy vs. Value theory

In philosophical ethics, the term "naturalistic fallacy" was introduced by British philosopher G. E. Moore in his 1903 book Principia Ethica. Value theory is a range of approaches to understanding how, why, and to what degree persons value things; whether the object or subject of valuing is a person, idea, object, or anything else.

Similarities between Naturalistic fallacy and Value theory

Naturalistic fallacy and Value theory have 2 things in common (in Unionpedia): Categorical imperative, Instrumental and intrinsic value.

Categorical imperative

The categorical imperative (kategorischer Imperativ) is the central philosophical concept in the deontological moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant.

Categorical imperative and Naturalistic fallacy · Categorical imperative and Value theory · See more »

Instrumental and intrinsic value

The word "value" is both a verb and a noun, each with multiple meanings.

Instrumental and intrinsic value and Naturalistic fallacy · Instrumental and intrinsic value and Value theory · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Naturalistic fallacy and Value theory Comparison

Naturalistic fallacy has 42 relations, while Value theory has 62. As they have in common 2, the Jaccard index is 1.92% = 2 / (42 + 62).

References

This article shows the relationship between Naturalistic fallacy and Value theory. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »