Pashto and Split ergativity

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Pashto and Split ergativity

Pashto vs. Split ergativity

Pashto (پښتو Pax̌tō), sometimes spelled Pukhto, is the language of the Pashtuns. Split ergativity is a term used by comparative linguists to refer to languages where some constructions use ergative syntax and morphology, but other constructions show another pattern, usually nominative-accusative.

Similarities between Pashto and Split ergativity

Pashto and Split ergativity have 5 things in common (in Unionpedia): Austronesian languages, Ergative–absolutive language, Grammatical case, Hindustani language, Indo-Iranian languages.

Austronesian languages

The Austronesian languages are a language family that is widely dispersed throughout Maritime Southeast Asia, Madagascar and the islands of the Pacific Ocean, with a few members in continental Asia.

Austronesian languages and Pashto · Austronesian languages and Split ergativity · See more »

Ergative–absolutive language

Ergative–absolutive languages, or ergative languages are languages that share a certain distinctive pattern relating to the subjects (technically, arguments) of verbs.

Ergative–absolutive language and Pashto · Ergative–absolutive language and Split ergativity · See more »

Grammatical case

Case is a special grammatical category of a noun, pronoun, adjective, participle or numeral whose value reflects the grammatical function performed by that word in a phrase, clause or sentence.

Grammatical case and Pashto · Grammatical case and Split ergativity · See more »

Hindustani language

Hindustani (हिन्दुस्तानी, ہندوستانی, ||lit.

Hindustani language and Pashto · Hindustani language and Split ergativity · See more »

Indo-Iranian languages

The Indo-Iranian languages or Indo-Iranic languages, or Aryan languages, constitute the largest and easternmost extant branch of the Indo-European language family.

Indo-Iranian languages and Pashto · Indo-Iranian languages and Split ergativity · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

What Pashto and Split ergativity have in common
What are the similarities between Pashto and Split ergativity

Pashto and Split ergativity Comparison

Pashto has 179 relations, while Split ergativity has 26. As they have in common 5, the Jaccard index is 2.44% = 5 / (179 + 26).

References

This article shows the relationship between Pashto and Split ergativity. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Unionpedia is a concept map or semantic network organized like an encyclopedia – dictionary. It gives a brief definition of each concept and its relationships.

This is a giant online mental map that serves as a basis for concept diagrams. It's free to use and each article or document can be downloaded. It's a tool, resource or reference for study, research, education, learning or teaching, that can be used by teachers, educators, pupils or students; for the academic world: for school, primary, secondary, high school, middle, technical degree, college, university, undergraduate, master's or doctoral degrees; for papers, reports, projects, ideas, documentation, surveys, summaries, or thesis. Here is the definition, explanation, description, or the meaning of each significant on which you need information, and a list of their associated concepts as a glossary. Available in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Japanese, Chinese, French, German, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Russian, Arabic, Hindi, Swedish, Ukrainian, Hungarian, Catalan, Czech, Hebrew, Danish, Finnish, Indonesian, Norwegian, Romanian, Turkish, Vietnamese, Korean, Thai, Greek, Bulgarian, Croatian, Slovak, Lithuanian, Filipino, Latvian, Estonian and Slovenian. More languages soon.

All the information was extracted from Wikipedia, and it's available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.

Unionpedia is not endorsed by or affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation.

Google Play, Android and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.