Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Androidâ„¢ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3) and WikiLeaks

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3) and WikiLeaks

R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3) vs. WikiLeaks

R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3) WLR (D) 237 is a 2014 legal case concerning the admissibility of a leaked Wikileaks cable as evidence in a dispute over the legality of a marine protected area in the British Indian Ocean Territory. WikiLeaks is an international non-profit organisation that publishes secret information, news leaks, and classified media provided by anonymous sources.

Similarities between R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3) and WikiLeaks

R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3) and WikiLeaks have 0 things in common (in Unionpedia).

The list above answers the following questions

R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3) and WikiLeaks Comparison

R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3) has 2 relations, while WikiLeaks has 344. As they have in common 0, the Jaccard index is 0.00% = 0 / (2 + 344).

References

This article shows the relationship between R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3) and WikiLeaks. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »