Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Androidâ„¢ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

R (Canada) v Adams and R v Mentuck

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between R (Canada) v Adams and R v Mentuck

R (Canada) v Adams vs. R v Mentuck

Justice Sopinka wrote for a unanimous court in this appeal from the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench on a case in which a Criminal Code section 486 publication ban was overturned by the trial judge, Justice Feehan, after he had found the primary witnesses for both sides of a sexual assault trial to be unreliable. Clayton Mentuck, a native lad, was accused of killing a 14 year old teenager, Amanda Cook, in 1996.

Similarities between R (Canada) v Adams and R v Mentuck

R (Canada) v Adams and R v Mentuck have 1 thing in common (in Unionpedia): Publication ban.

Publication ban

A publication ban is a court order which prohibits the public or media from disseminating certain details of an otherwise public judicial proceeding.

Publication ban and R (Canada) v Adams · Publication ban and R v Mentuck · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

R (Canada) v Adams and R v Mentuck Comparison

R (Canada) v Adams has 7 relations, while R v Mentuck has 14. As they have in common 1, the Jaccard index is 4.76% = 1 / (7 + 14).

References

This article shows the relationship between R (Canada) v Adams and R v Mentuck. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »