Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport and Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport and Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund

R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport vs. Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund

R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport was a judicial review case taken against the United Kingdom government by a company of Spanish fishermen who claimed that the United Kingdom had breached European Union law by requiring ships to have a majority of British owners if they were to be registered in the UK. The Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund are financial tools set up to implement the regional policy of the European Union.

Similarities between R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport and Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund

R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport and Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund have 0 things in common (in Unionpedia).

The list above answers the following questions

R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport and Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund Comparison

R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport has 87 relations, while Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund has 19. As they have in common 0, the Jaccard index is 0.00% = 0 / (87 + 19).

References

This article shows the relationship between R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport and Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »