Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Install
Faster access than browser!
 

Ad hominem and The Art of Being Right

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Ad hominem and The Art of Being Right

Ad hominem vs. The Art of Being Right

Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (also Eristic Dialectic: The Art of Winning an Argument; German: Eristische Dialektik: Die Kunst, Recht zu behalten; 1831) is an acidulous and sarcastic treatise written by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer in sardonic deadpan.

Similarities between Ad hominem and The Art of Being Right

Ad hominem and The Art of Being Right have 1 thing in common (in Unionpedia): Argument from authority.

Argument from authority

An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, or argumentum ad verecundiam is a form of defeasible argument in which a claimed authority's support is used as evidence for an argument's conclusion.

Ad hominem and Argument from authority · Argument from authority and The Art of Being Right · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Ad hominem and The Art of Being Right Comparison

Ad hominem has 41 relations, while The Art of Being Right has 19. As they have in common 1, the Jaccard index is 1.67% = 1 / (41 + 19).

References

This article shows the relationship between Ad hominem and The Art of Being Right. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »