Exhausted combination doctrine and Tie-in
Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.
Difference between Exhausted combination doctrine and Tie-in
Exhausted combination doctrine vs. Tie-in
The exhausted combination doctrine, also referred to as the doctrine of the Lincoln Engineering case, is the doctrine of U.S. patent law that when an inventor invents a new, unobvious device and seeks to patent not merely the new device but also the combination of the new device with a known, conventional device with which the new device cooperates in the conventional and predictable way in which devices of those types have previously cooperated, the combination is unpatentable as an "exhausted combination" or "old combination". A tie-in work is a work of fiction or other product based on a media property such as a film, video game, television series, board game, web site, role-playing game or literary property.
Similarities between Exhausted combination doctrine and Tie-in
Exhausted combination doctrine and Tie-in have 0 things in common (in Unionpedia).
The list above answers the following questions
- What Exhausted combination doctrine and Tie-in have in common
- What are the similarities between Exhausted combination doctrine and Tie-in
Exhausted combination doctrine and Tie-in Comparison
Exhausted combination doctrine has 18 relations, while Tie-in has 59. As they have in common 0, the Jaccard index is 0.00% = 0 / (18 + 59).
References
This article shows the relationship between Exhausted combination doctrine and Tie-in. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:
Faster access than browser!
