Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Install
Faster access than browser!
 

1355 and Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between 1355 and Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester

1355 vs. Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester

Year 1355 (MCCCLV) was a common year starting on Thursday (link will display the full calendar) of the Julian calendar. Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester, 1st Earl of Buckingham, 1st Earl of Essex, KG (7 January 1355 – 8 or 9 September 1397) was the fourteenth and youngest child of King Edward III of England and Philippa of Hainault.

Similarities between 1355 and Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester

1355 and Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester have 2 things in common (in Unionpedia): Edward II of England, Edward III of England.

Edward II of England

Edward II (25 April 1284 – 21 September 1327), also called Edward of Carnarvon, was King of England from 1307 until he was deposed in January 1327.

1355 and Edward II of England · Edward II of England and Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester · See more »

Edward III of England

Edward III (13 November 1312 – 21 June 1377) was King of England and Lord of Ireland from January 1327 until his death; he is noted for his military success and for restoring royal authority after the disastrous and unorthodox reign of his father, Edward II.

1355 and Edward III of England · Edward III of England and Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

1355 and Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester Comparison

1355 has 65 relations, while Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester has 76. As they have in common 2, the Jaccard index is 1.42% = 2 / (65 + 76).

References

This article shows the relationship between 1355 and Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »