Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

689 and Guo Zhengyi

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between 689 and Guo Zhengyi

689 vs. Guo Zhengyi

Year 689 (DCLXXXIX) was a common year starting on Friday (link will display the full calendar) of the Julian calendar. Guo Zhengyi (郭正一) (died September 10, 689) was an official of the Chinese Tang Dynasty, serving as a chancellor during the reign of Emperor Gaozong and the regency of Emperor Gaozong's wife Empress Wu (later known as Wu Zetian) over their son Emperor Zhongzong.

Similarities between 689 and Guo Zhengyi

689 and Guo Zhengyi have 3 things in common (in Unionpedia): History of China, Liu Jingxian, Tang dynasty.

History of China

The earliest known written records of the history of China date from as early as 1250 BC,William G. Boltz, Early Chinese Writing, World Archaeology, Vol.

689 and History of China · Guo Zhengyi and History of China · See more »

Liu Jingxian

Liu Jingxian (劉景先) (died 689), né Liu Qixian (劉齊賢), was an official of the Chinese dynasty Tang Dynasty, serving as chancellor late in the reign of Emperor Gaozong and the subsequent regency of Emperor Gaozong's wife Empress Dowager Wu (later known as Wu Zetian) over their sons Emperor Zhongzong and Emperor Ruizong.

689 and Liu Jingxian · Guo Zhengyi and Liu Jingxian · See more »

Tang dynasty

The Tang dynasty or the Tang Empire was an imperial dynasty of China preceded by the Sui dynasty and followed by the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period.

689 and Tang dynasty · Guo Zhengyi and Tang dynasty · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

689 and Guo Zhengyi Comparison

689 has 76 relations, while Guo Zhengyi has 30. As they have in common 3, the Jaccard index is 2.83% = 3 / (76 + 30).

References

This article shows the relationship between 689 and Guo Zhengyi. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »