Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Download
Faster access than browser!
 

Burushaski and Plurale tantum

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Burushaski and Plurale tantum

Burushaski vs. Plurale tantum

Burushaski (بروشسکی) is a language isolate spoken by Burusho people who reside almost entirely in northern Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan, with a few hundred speakers in northern Jammu and Kashmir, India. A plurale tantum (Latin for "plural only", plural form: pluralia tantum) is a noun that appears only in the plural form and does not have a singular variant for referring to a single object.

Similarities between Burushaski and Plurale tantum

Burushaski and Plurale tantum have 3 things in common (in Unionpedia): Grammatical number, Mass noun, Plural.

Grammatical number

In linguistics, grammatical number is a grammatical category of nouns, pronouns, and adjective and verb agreement that expresses count distinctions (such as "one", "two", or "three or more").

Burushaski and Grammatical number · Grammatical number and Plurale tantum · See more »

Mass noun

In linguistics, a mass noun, uncountable noun, or non-count noun is a noun with the syntactic property that any quantity of it is treated as an undifferentiated unit, rather than as something with discrete subsets.

Burushaski and Mass noun · Mass noun and Plurale tantum · See more »

Plural

The plural (sometimes abbreviated), in many languages, is one of the values of the grammatical category of number.

Burushaski and Plural · Plural and Plurale tantum · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Burushaski and Plurale tantum Comparison

Burushaski has 127 relations, while Plurale tantum has 33. As they have in common 3, the Jaccard index is 1.88% = 3 / (127 + 33).

References

This article shows the relationship between Burushaski and Plurale tantum. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »