Similarities between Call stack and Executable-space protection
Call stack and Executable-space protection have 6 things in common (in Unionpedia): Buffer overflow, Exploit (computer security), Memory management, Operating system, Return-oriented programming, Return-to-libc attack.
Buffer overflow
In programming and information security, a buffer overflow or buffer overrun is an anomaly whereby a program writes data to a buffer beyond the buffer's allocated memory, overwriting adjacent memory locations.
Buffer overflow and Call stack · Buffer overflow and Executable-space protection ·
Exploit (computer security)
An exploit (from the English verb to exploit, meaning "to use something to one’s own advantage") is a piece of software, a chunk of data, or a sequence of commands that takes advantage of a bug or vulnerability to cause unintended or unanticipated behavior to occur on computer software, hardware, or something electronic (usually computerized).
Call stack and Exploit (computer security) · Executable-space protection and Exploit (computer security) ·
Memory management
Memory management is a form of resource management applied to computer memory.
Call stack and Memory management · Executable-space protection and Memory management ·
Operating system
An operating system (OS) is system software that manages computer hardware and software resources, and provides common services for computer programs.
Call stack and Operating system · Executable-space protection and Operating system ·
Return-oriented programming
Return-oriented programming (ROP) is a computer security exploit technique that allows an attacker to execute code in the presence of security defenses such as executable space protection and code signing.
Call stack and Return-oriented programming · Executable-space protection and Return-oriented programming ·
Return-to-libc attack
A "return-to-libc" attack is a computer security attack usually starting with a buffer overflow in which a subroutine return address on a call stack is replaced by an address of a subroutine that is already present in the process executable memory, bypassing the no-execute bit feature (if present) and ridding the attacker of the need to inject their own code.
Call stack and Return-to-libc attack · Executable-space protection and Return-to-libc attack ·
The list above answers the following questions
- What Call stack and Executable-space protection have in common
- What are the similarities between Call stack and Executable-space protection
Call stack and Executable-space protection Comparison
Call stack has 71 relations, while Executable-space protection has 89. As they have in common 6, the Jaccard index is 3.75% = 6 / (71 + 89).
References
This article shows the relationship between Call stack and Executable-space protection. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: