Similarities between Condorcet paradox and Majority rule
Condorcet paradox and Majority rule have 2 things in common (in Unionpedia): Arrow's impossibility theorem, Nakamura number.
Arrow's impossibility theorem
In social choice theory, Arrow's impossibility theorem, the general possibility theorem or Arrow's paradox is an impossibility theorem stating that when voters have three or more distinct alternatives (options), no ranked voting electoral system can convert the ranked preferences of individuals into a community-wide (complete and transitive) ranking while also meeting a specified set of criteria: unrestricted domain, non-dictatorship, Pareto efficiency and independence of irrelevant alternatives.
Arrow's impossibility theorem and Condorcet paradox · Arrow's impossibility theorem and Majority rule ·
Nakamura number
In cooperative game theory and social choice theory, the Nakamura number measures the degree of rationality of preference aggregation rules (collective decision rules), such as voting rules.
Condorcet paradox and Nakamura number · Majority rule and Nakamura number ·
The list above answers the following questions
- What Condorcet paradox and Majority rule have in common
- What are the similarities between Condorcet paradox and Majority rule
Condorcet paradox and Majority rule Comparison
Condorcet paradox has 20 relations, while Majority rule has 43. As they have in common 2, the Jaccard index is 3.17% = 2 / (20 + 43).
References
This article shows the relationship between Condorcet paradox and Majority rule. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: