Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Install
Faster access than browser!
 

Condorcet paradox and Majority rule

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Condorcet paradox and Majority rule

Condorcet paradox vs. Majority rule

The Condorcet paradox (also known as voting paradox or the paradox of voting) in social choice theory is a situation noted by the Marquis de Condorcet in the late 18th century, in which collective preferences can be cyclic, even if the preferences of individual voters are not cyclic. Majority rule is a decision rule that selects alternatives which have a majority, that is, more than half the votes.

Similarities between Condorcet paradox and Majority rule

Condorcet paradox and Majority rule have 2 things in common (in Unionpedia): Arrow's impossibility theorem, Nakamura number.

Arrow's impossibility theorem

In social choice theory, Arrow's impossibility theorem, the general possibility theorem or Arrow's paradox is an impossibility theorem stating that when voters have three or more distinct alternatives (options), no ranked voting electoral system can convert the ranked preferences of individuals into a community-wide (complete and transitive) ranking while also meeting a specified set of criteria: unrestricted domain, non-dictatorship, Pareto efficiency and independence of irrelevant alternatives.

Arrow's impossibility theorem and Condorcet paradox · Arrow's impossibility theorem and Majority rule · See more »

Nakamura number

In cooperative game theory and social choice theory, the Nakamura number measures the degree of rationality of preference aggregation rules (collective decision rules), such as voting rules.

Condorcet paradox and Nakamura number · Majority rule and Nakamura number · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Condorcet paradox and Majority rule Comparison

Condorcet paradox has 20 relations, while Majority rule has 43. As they have in common 2, the Jaccard index is 3.17% = 2 / (20 + 43).

References

This article shows the relationship between Condorcet paradox and Majority rule. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »