Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

Condorcet paradox and Nontransitive dice

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Condorcet paradox and Nontransitive dice

Condorcet paradox vs. Nontransitive dice

The Condorcet paradox (also known as voting paradox or the paradox of voting) in social choice theory is a situation noted by the Marquis de Condorcet in the late 18th century, in which collective preferences can be cyclic, even if the preferences of individual voters are not cyclic. A set of dice is nontransitive if it contains three dice, A, B, and C, with the property that A rolls higher than B more than half the time, and B rolls higher than C more than half the time, but it is not true that A rolls higher than C more than half the time.

Similarities between Condorcet paradox and Nontransitive dice

Condorcet paradox and Nontransitive dice have 1 thing in common (in Unionpedia): Transitive relation.

Transitive relation

In mathematics, a binary relation over a set is transitive if whenever an element is related to an element and is related to an element then is also related to.

Condorcet paradox and Transitive relation · Nontransitive dice and Transitive relation · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Condorcet paradox and Nontransitive dice Comparison

Condorcet paradox has 20 relations, while Nontransitive dice has 18. As they have in common 1, the Jaccard index is 2.63% = 1 / (20 + 18).

References

This article shows the relationship between Condorcet paradox and Nontransitive dice. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »