Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Download
Faster access than browser!
 

Criterion of embarrassment and Historicity of Jesus

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Criterion of embarrassment and Historicity of Jesus

Criterion of embarrassment vs. Historicity of Jesus

The criterion of embarrassment is a type of critical analysis in which an account likely to be embarrassing to its author is presumed to be true because the author would have no reason to invent an embarrassing account about him- or herself. The historicity of Jesus concerns the degree to which sources show Jesus of Nazareth existed as a historical figure.

Similarities between Criterion of embarrassment and Historicity of Jesus

Criterion of embarrassment and Historicity of Jesus have 8 things in common (in Unionpedia): Biblical criticism, Crucifixion of Jesus, Early Christianity, Gospel, Historical method, Jesus, John P. Meier, New Testament.

Biblical criticism

Biblical criticism is a philosophical and methodological approach to studying the Bible, using neutral non-sectarian judgment, that grew out of the scientific thinking of the Age of Reason (1700–1789).

Biblical criticism and Criterion of embarrassment · Biblical criticism and Historicity of Jesus · See more »

Crucifixion of Jesus

The crucifixion of Jesus occurred in 1st-century Judea, most likely between AD 30 and 33.

Criterion of embarrassment and Crucifixion of Jesus · Crucifixion of Jesus and Historicity of Jesus · See more »

Early Christianity

Early Christianity, defined as the period of Christianity preceding the First Council of Nicaea in 325, typically divides historically into the Apostolic Age and the Ante-Nicene Period (from the Apostolic Age until Nicea).

Criterion of embarrassment and Early Christianity · Early Christianity and Historicity of Jesus · See more »

Gospel

Gospel is the Old English translation of Greek εὐαγγέλιον, evangelion, meaning "good news".

Criterion of embarrassment and Gospel · Gospel and Historicity of Jesus · See more »

Historical method

Historical method comprises the techniques and guidelines by which historians use primary sources and other evidence, including the evidence of archaeology, to research and then to write histories in the form of accounts of the past.

Criterion of embarrassment and Historical method · Historical method and Historicity of Jesus · See more »

Jesus

Jesus, also referred to as Jesus of Nazareth and Jesus Christ, was a first-century Jewish preacher and religious leader.

Criterion of embarrassment and Jesus · Historicity of Jesus and Jesus · See more »

John P. Meier

John Paul Meier (born 1942) is an American biblical scholar and Roman Catholic priest.

Criterion of embarrassment and John P. Meier · Historicity of Jesus and John P. Meier · See more »

New Testament

The New Testament (Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη, trans. Hē Kainḕ Diathḗkē; Novum Testamentum) is the second part of the Christian biblical canon, the first part being the Old Testament, based on the Hebrew Bible.

Criterion of embarrassment and New Testament · Historicity of Jesus and New Testament · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Criterion of embarrassment and Historicity of Jesus Comparison

Criterion of embarrassment has 25 relations, while Historicity of Jesus has 112. As they have in common 8, the Jaccard index is 5.84% = 8 / (25 + 112).

References

This article shows the relationship between Criterion of embarrassment and Historicity of Jesus. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »