Similarities between Lhasa Tibetan and Sino-Tibetan languages
Lhasa Tibetan and Sino-Tibetan languages have 15 things in common (in Unionpedia): Bodish languages, Classical Tibetan, East Asia, Ergative case, Evidentiality, Heinrich August Jäschke, Linguistic typology, Old Chinese, Old Tibetan, Subject–object–verb word order, Tibetic languages, Tibeto-Burman languages, Tibeto-Kanauri languages, Tone (linguistics), Transitivity (grammar).
Bodish languages
Bodish, named for the Tibetan ethnonym Bod, is a proposed grouping consisting of the Tibetic languages and associated Sino-Tibetan languages spoken in Tibet, North India, Nepal, Bhutan, and North Pakistan.
Bodish languages and Lhasa Tibetan · Bodish languages and Sino-Tibetan languages ·
Classical Tibetan
Classical Tibetan refers to the language of any text written in Tibetic after the Old Tibetan period.
Classical Tibetan and Lhasa Tibetan · Classical Tibetan and Sino-Tibetan languages ·
East Asia
East Asia is a geographical and cultural region of Asia including the countries of China, Japan, Mongolia, North Korea, South Korea, and Taiwan.
East Asia and Lhasa Tibetan · East Asia and Sino-Tibetan languages ·
Ergative case
In grammar, the ergative case (abbreviated) is the grammatical case that identifies a nominal phrase as the agent of a transitive verb in ergative–absolutive languages.
Ergative case and Lhasa Tibetan · Ergative case and Sino-Tibetan languages ·
Evidentiality
In linguistics, evidentiality is, broadly, the indication of the nature of evidence for a given statement; that is, whether evidence exists for the statement and if so, what kind.
Evidentiality and Lhasa Tibetan · Evidentiality and Sino-Tibetan languages ·
Heinrich August Jäschke
Heinrich August Jäschke (17 May 1817 in Herrnhut – 24 September 1883) was a German Tibetologist missionary and Bible translator.
Heinrich August Jäschke and Lhasa Tibetan · Heinrich August Jäschke and Sino-Tibetan languages ·
Linguistic typology
Linguistic typology (or language typology) is a field of linguistics that studies and classifies languages according to their structural features to allow their comparison.
Lhasa Tibetan and Linguistic typology · Linguistic typology and Sino-Tibetan languages ·
Old Chinese
Old Chinese, also called Archaic Chinese in older works, is the oldest attested stage of Chinese, and the ancestor of all modern varieties of Chinese.
Lhasa Tibetan and Old Chinese · Old Chinese and Sino-Tibetan languages ·
Old Tibetan
Old Tibetan refers to the earliest attested form of Tibetan language, reflected in documents from the adoption of writing by the Tibetan Empire in the mid-7th century to the early 9th century.
Lhasa Tibetan and Old Tibetan · Old Tibetan and Sino-Tibetan languages ·
Subject–object–verb word order
In linguistic typology, a subject–object–verb (SOV) language is one in which the subject, object, and verb of a sentence always or usually appear in that order.
Lhasa Tibetan and Subject–object–verb word order · Sino-Tibetan languages and Subject–object–verb word order ·
Tibetic languages
The Tibetic languages form a well-defined group of languages descending from Old Tibetan (7th to 9th centuries,Tournadre, Nicolas. 2014. "The Tibetic languages and their classification." In Trans-Himalayan linguistics, historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. or to the 11th/12th centuries).
Lhasa Tibetan and Tibetic languages · Sino-Tibetan languages and Tibetic languages ·
Tibeto-Burman languages
The Tibeto-Burman languages are the non-Sinitic members of the Sino-Tibetan language family, over 400 of which are spoken throughout the Southeast Asian Massif ("Zomia") as well as parts of East Asia and South Asia.
Lhasa Tibetan and Tibeto-Burman languages · Sino-Tibetan languages and Tibeto-Burman languages ·
Tibeto-Kanauri languages
The Tibeto-Kanauri languages, also called Bodic, Bodish–Himalayish, and Western Tibeto-Burman, are a proposed intermediate level of classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages, centered on the Tibetic languages and the Kinnauri dialect cluster.
Lhasa Tibetan and Tibeto-Kanauri languages · Sino-Tibetan languages and Tibeto-Kanauri languages ·
Tone (linguistics)
Tone is the use of pitch in language to distinguish lexical or grammatical meaning—that is, to distinguish or to inflect words.
Lhasa Tibetan and Tone (linguistics) · Sino-Tibetan languages and Tone (linguistics) ·
Transitivity (grammar)
Transitivity is a linguistics property that relates to whether a verb, participle, or gerund denotes a transitive object.
Lhasa Tibetan and Transitivity (grammar) · Sino-Tibetan languages and Transitivity (grammar) ·
The list above answers the following questions
- What Lhasa Tibetan and Sino-Tibetan languages have in common
- What are the similarities between Lhasa Tibetan and Sino-Tibetan languages
Lhasa Tibetan and Sino-Tibetan languages Comparison
Lhasa Tibetan has 152 relations, while Sino-Tibetan languages has 227. As they have in common 15, the Jaccard index is 3.96% = 15 / (152 + 227).
References
This article shows the relationship between Lhasa Tibetan and Sino-Tibetan languages. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: