Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Free
Faster access than browser!
 

Plurality-at-large voting and Whip (politics)

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Plurality-at-large voting and Whip (politics)

Plurality-at-large voting vs. Whip (politics)

Plurality-at-large voting, also known as block vote or multiple non-transferable vote (MNTV), is a non-proportional voting system for electing several representatives from a single multimember electoral district using a series of check boxes and tallying votes similar to a plurality election. A whip is an official of a political party whose task is to ensure party discipline in a legislature.

Similarities between Plurality-at-large voting and Whip (politics)

Plurality-at-large voting and Whip (politics) have 2 things in common (in Unionpedia): Canada, United Kingdom.

Canada

Canada is a country located in the northern part of North America.

Canada and Plurality-at-large voting · Canada and Whip (politics) · See more »

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, commonly known as the United Kingdom (UK) or Britain,Usage is mixed with some organisations, including the and preferring to use Britain as shorthand for Great Britain is a sovereign country in western Europe.

Plurality-at-large voting and United Kingdom · United Kingdom and Whip (politics) · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Plurality-at-large voting and Whip (politics) Comparison

Plurality-at-large voting has 93 relations, while Whip (politics) has 73. As they have in common 2, the Jaccard index is 1.20% = 2 / (93 + 73).

References

This article shows the relationship between Plurality-at-large voting and Whip (politics). To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »