Logo
Unionpedia
Communication
Get it on Google Play
New! Download Unionpedia on your Android™ device!
Install
Faster access than browser!
 

Satsuma Domain and Shimazu Iehisa

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between Satsuma Domain and Shimazu Iehisa

Satsuma Domain vs. Shimazu Iehisa

, also known as Kagoshima Domain, was a Japanese domain of the Edo period. was a Japanese samurai of the Sengoku period, who was a member of the Shimazu clan of Satsuma Province.

Similarities between Satsuma Domain and Shimazu Iehisa

Satsuma Domain and Shimazu Iehisa have 5 things in common (in Unionpedia): Japan, Kyushu, Satsuma Province, Sengoku period, Shimazu clan.

Japan

Japan (日本; Nippon or Nihon; formally 日本国 or Nihon-koku, lit. "State of Japan") is a sovereign island country in East Asia.

Japan and Satsuma Domain · Japan and Shimazu Iehisa · See more »

Kyushu

is the third largest island of Japan and most southwesterly of its four main islands.

Kyushu and Satsuma Domain · Kyushu and Shimazu Iehisa · See more »

Satsuma Province

was an old province of Japan that is now the western half of Kagoshima Prefecture on the island of Kyūshū.

Satsuma Domain and Satsuma Province · Satsuma Province and Shimazu Iehisa · See more »

Sengoku period

The is a period in Japanese history marked by social upheaval, political intrigue and near-constant military conflict.

Satsuma Domain and Sengoku period · Sengoku period and Shimazu Iehisa · See more »

Shimazu clan

The were the daimyō of the Satsuma han, which spread over Satsuma, Ōsumi and Hyūga provinces in Japan.

Satsuma Domain and Shimazu clan · Shimazu Iehisa and Shimazu clan · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

Satsuma Domain and Shimazu Iehisa Comparison

Satsuma Domain has 132 relations, while Shimazu Iehisa has 9. As they have in common 5, the Jaccard index is 3.55% = 5 / (132 + 9).

References

This article shows the relationship between Satsuma Domain and Shimazu Iehisa. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit:

Hey! We are on Facebook now! »