Similarities between Proto-Indo-European language and Urheimat
Proto-Indo-European language and Urheimat have 16 things in common (in Unionpedia): Altaic languages, Anatolian hypothesis, Armenian hypothesis, Egyptian language, German language, Indigenous Aryans, Indo-Aryan languages, Indo-European migrations, Indo-Uralic languages, Japanese language, Neolithic, Paleolithic Continuity Theory, Proto-Human language, Proto-language, Roger Blench, Uralic languages.
Altaic languages
Altaic is a proposed language family of central Eurasia and Siberia, now widely seen as discredited.
Altaic languages and Proto-Indo-European language · Altaic languages and Urheimat ·
Anatolian hypothesis
The Anatolian hypothesis, also known as the Anatolian theory or the sedentary farmer theory, first developed by British archaeologist Colin Renfrew in 1987, proposes that the dispersal of Proto-Indo-Europeans originated in Neolithic Anatolia.
Anatolian hypothesis and Proto-Indo-European language · Anatolian hypothesis and Urheimat ·
Armenian hypothesis
The Armenian hypothesis of the Proto-Indo-European homeland, proposed by Georgian Tamaz V. Gamkrelidze and Russian linguist Vyacheslav Ivanov in 1985, suggests that Proto-Indo-European was spoken during the 4th millennium BC in the Armenian Highlands.
Armenian hypothesis and Proto-Indo-European language · Armenian hypothesis and Urheimat ·
Egyptian language
The Egyptian language was spoken in ancient Egypt and was a branch of the Afro-Asiatic languages.
Egyptian language and Proto-Indo-European language · Egyptian language and Urheimat ·
German language
German (Deutsch) is a West Germanic language that is mainly spoken in Central Europe.
German language and Proto-Indo-European language · German language and Urheimat ·
Indigenous Aryans
The Indigenous Aryans theory, also known as the Out of India Theory, proposes that the Indo-European languages, or at least the Indo-Aryan languages, originated within the Indian subcontinent, as an alternative to the established migration model which proposes the Pontic steppe as the area of origin of the Indo-European languages.
Indigenous Aryans and Proto-Indo-European language · Indigenous Aryans and Urheimat ·
Indo-Aryan languages
The Indo-Aryan or Indic languages are the dominant language family of the Indian subcontinent.
Indo-Aryan languages and Proto-Indo-European language · Indo-Aryan languages and Urheimat ·
Indo-European migrations
Indo-European migrations were the migrations of pastoral peoples speaking the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE), who departed from the Yamnaya and related cultures in the Pontic–Caspian steppe, starting at.
Indo-European migrations and Proto-Indo-European language · Indo-European migrations and Urheimat ·
Indo-Uralic languages
Indo-Uralic is a proposed language family consisting of Indo-European and Uralic.
Indo-Uralic languages and Proto-Indo-European language · Indo-Uralic languages and Urheimat ·
Japanese language
is an East Asian language spoken by about 128 million people, primarily in Japan, where it is the national language.
Japanese language and Proto-Indo-European language · Japanese language and Urheimat ·
Neolithic
The Neolithic was a period in the development of human technology, beginning about 10,200 BC, according to the ASPRO chronology, in some parts of Western Asia, and later in other parts of the world and ending between 4500 and 2000 BC.
Neolithic and Proto-Indo-European language · Neolithic and Urheimat ·
Paleolithic Continuity Theory
The Paleolithic Continuity Theory (or PCT, Italian La teoria della continuità), since 2010 relabelled as a "paradigm", as in Paleolithic Continuity Paradigm or PCP), is a hypothesis suggesting that the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) can be traced back to the Upper Paleolithic, several millennia earlier than the Chalcolithic or at the most Neolithic estimates in other scenarios of Proto-Indo-European origins. As advanced by Mario Alinei in his Origini delle Lingue d’Europa (Origins of the Languages of Europe), published in two volumes in 1996 and 2000, the PCT posits that the advent of Indo-European languages should be linked to the arrival of Homo sapiens in Europe and Asia from Africa in the Upper Paleolithic. Employing "lexical periodisation", Alinei arrives at a timeline deeper than even that of Colin Renfrew's Anatolian hypothesis, previously the mainstream linguistic theory proposing the earliest origin for Indo-European. Since 2004, an informal workgroup of scholars who support the Paleolithic Continuity Theory has been held online. Members of the group (referred to as "Scientific Committee" in the website) include linguists Xaverio Ballester (University of Valencia) and Francesco Benozzo (University of Bologna), prehistorian Marcel Otte (Université de Liège) and anthropologist Henry Harpending (University of Utah). The Paleolithic Continuity Theory is distinctly a minority view as it enjoys very little academic support, serious discussion being limited to a small circle of scholars. It is not listed by Mallory among the proposals for the origins of the Indo-European languages that are widely discussed and considered credible within academia.
Paleolithic Continuity Theory and Proto-Indo-European language · Paleolithic Continuity Theory and Urheimat ·
Proto-Human language
The Proto-Human language (also Proto-Sapiens, Proto-World) is the hypothetical direct genetic predecessor of the world's languages.
Proto-Human language and Proto-Indo-European language · Proto-Human language and Urheimat ·
Proto-language
A proto-language, in the tree model of historical linguistics, is a language, usually hypothetical or reconstructed, and usually unattested, from which a number of attested known languages are believed to have descended by evolution, forming a language family.
Proto-Indo-European language and Proto-language · Proto-language and Urheimat ·
Roger Blench
Roger Marsh Blench (born 1953) is a British linguist, ethnomusicologist and development anthropologist.
Proto-Indo-European language and Roger Blench · Roger Blench and Urheimat ·
Uralic languages
The Uralic languages (sometimes called Uralian languages) form a language family of 38 languages spoken by approximately 25million people, predominantly in Northern Eurasia.
Proto-Indo-European language and Uralic languages · Uralic languages and Urheimat ·
The list above answers the following questions
- What Proto-Indo-European language and Urheimat have in common
- What are the similarities between Proto-Indo-European language and Urheimat
Proto-Indo-European language and Urheimat Comparison
Proto-Indo-European language has 269 relations, while Urheimat has 332. As they have in common 16, the Jaccard index is 2.66% = 16 / (269 + 332).
References
This article shows the relationship between Proto-Indo-European language and Urheimat. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: